<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Foss on oit blarg!</title>
    <link>https://oit.cloud/tags/foss/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Foss on oit blarg!</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    
    <language>en-us</language>
    
    
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://oit.cloud/tags/foss/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts on AI Contributions in Open Source</title>
      <link>https://oit.cloud/posts/2026-05-07_thoughts_on_ai_in_opensource/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://oit.cloud/posts/2026-05-07_thoughts_on_ai_in_opensource/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With recent grumbling about permitting AI contributions to FreeCAD, threats of core maintainers
departing under this policy and my general desire to have absolutely &lt;em&gt;NOTHING&lt;/em&gt; to do with AI, I
figured it was time to start taking part in the weekly FreeCAD developers meeting. Last Sunday (26/06/02)
was my first one and while I mostly kept to myself (some snark was required) I have some observations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-core-argument-against-a-no-ai-policy&#34;&gt;The Core Argument Against a no-AI policy.&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly I think its important to show &lt;a href=&#34;https://cloud.freecad.org/s/nGtXFroNsi53g5C?dir=/&amp;amp;editing=false&amp;amp;openfile=true&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34;&gt;Yorik&amp;rsquo;s proposal&lt;/a&gt;
 for a no-AI policy, so far I&amp;rsquo;ve yet to see
anything as articulate as this from the pro-AI camp.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content>&lt;p&gt;With recent grumbling about permitting AI contributions to FreeCAD, threats of core maintainers
departing under this policy and my general desire to have absolutely &lt;em&gt;NOTHING&lt;/em&gt; to do with AI, I
figured it was time to start taking part in the weekly FreeCAD developers meeting. Last Sunday (26/06/02)
was my first one and while I mostly kept to myself (some snark was required) I have some observations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-core-argument-against-a-no-ai-policy&#34;&gt;The Core Argument Against a no-AI policy.&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly I think its important to show &lt;a href=&#34;https://cloud.freecad.org/s/nGtXFroNsi53g5C?dir=/&amp;amp;editing=false&amp;amp;openfile=true&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34;&gt;Yorik&amp;rsquo;s proposal&lt;/a&gt;
 for a no-AI policy, so far I&amp;rsquo;ve yet to see
anything as articulate as this from the pro-AI camp.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the argument goes, for some reason, a no-AI policy is will be more difficult to enforce than
a &amp;lsquo;some-AI&amp;rsquo; policy. At first, I cannot fathom how this is possible, it is proposed that &amp;lsquo;because
people are going to do it anyhow&amp;rsquo; the no-AI policy will be more difficult. This still doesn&amp;rsquo;t
make any sense to me. I likened this to &amp;ldquo;people commit murder, therefor we should relax murder laws&amp;rdquo;.
Of course the (intended) absurdity of this was jumped on in an effort to not acknowledge the underlying
point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But as I think about it more, I believe I have the answer. It&amp;rsquo;s because with a watered down policy,
they got what they want, an opening to use AI and they have ZERO intent to actually do any enforcement.
Enforcement is someone else&amp;rsquo;s responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1 id=&#34;bike-polo&#34;&gt;Bike Polo&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(didn&amp;rsquo;t expect it to go here, did ya?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I used to play bike polo, a lot. I spend the better part of 5 years traveling the world playing. I played
so much I was part of the core organizing team for the 2008 World Championship. Good days, I had a lot
of fun and met a lot of great people, many of whom I am still friends with to this day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What&amp;rsquo;s this to do with AI policy?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In and around 2008 there was a lot of debate about contact. The no contact group had a list of concerns,
people getting hurt, equipment getting broken and most importantly, it made referring increasingly difficult.
The pro-contact people basically came with, &amp;ldquo;I wanna hit people&amp;rdquo;. The 2008 worlds was the last to have a
no contact rule set and in the year following contact was ratified in the increasingly sizeable rule book.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fast forward 20 years and from what I understand (my partner still plays), the rules have evolved to be
basically no contact, but now with a half dozen pages dedicated to describing what no contact means.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2008 rules where on a single page.&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
